Sender: eric@ruckus.brouhaha.com
From: Eric Smith <eric-no-spam-for-me@brouhaha.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
Subject: Re: Zork 4/ Enchanter 4 etc...?
References: <q22ilu46ftcv5olhc5tihflmenv82mh2sp@4ax.com> <go969.118541$uj.164587@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net> <qh7kish9x4.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <SqN69.28080$983.44805@rwcrnsc53>
Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy.
Date: 15 Aug 2002 12:21:10 -0700
Message-ID: <qh7kis7wt5.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>
Lines: 20
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.66.107.17
X-Trace: 15 Aug 2002 12:41:57 -0700, 209.66.107.17
Path: news.duke.edu!newsgate.duke.edu!nntp-out.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!cyclone.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!news.spies.com!209.66.107.17
Xref: news.duke.edu rec.arts.int-fiction:107518

"Cryptonomic" <cryptonomic_nospam@hotmail.com> writes:
> Is this Infocom's designation for the "Zork Series"? In other words, is this
> official? (The series is listed out of order of the dates of the games so if
> this was made a "series", it was done retroactively.)

No, it wasn't done retroactively.  But the designations were not assigned
in order, at least in the case of Wishbringer.

> I am not sure why
> "Wishbringer" and "Trinity" are considered part of the "Zork Series".

Because they didn't fit in the other series?

Aspects of Wishbringer mesh reasonably well with the Zorks, but then,
so do several other games including Starcross.

> I assume "Zork Nemesis" and "Zork Grand Inquisitor" fit in on the end of the
> list.

No, because they aren't Infocom games.
