Internet-Draft https-notif-cbor March 2025
Chittapragada, et al. Expires 4 September 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Configuration
Internet-Draft:
draft-chittapragada-netconf-https-notif-cbor-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
B. M. Chittapragada
S. Bhat
V. T. Rao
H. Arshad
M. P. Tahiliani
National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal

CBOR Encoding for HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications

Abstract

This document extends [I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15] by introducing CBOR encoding for YANG notifications over HTTPS in addition to the existing JSON and XML encoding schemes.

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://MeherRushi.github.io/draft-chittapragada-netconf-https-notif-cbor/draft-chittapragada-netconf-https-notif-cbor.html. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chittapragada-netconf-https-notif-cbor/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the Network Configuration mailing list (mailto:netconf@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/MeherRushi/draft-chittapragada-netconf-https-notif-cbor.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 4 September 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

This document introduces a CBOR encoding scheme for event notifications over HTTPS by using the framework proposed in [I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15] which supports transfer of YANG notifications over HTTPS using JSON and XML encoding schemes.

In [I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15], the capabilities HTTP-target resource allows a publisher to retrieve supported encoding formats via a GET request, while the relay-notification resource enables the publisher to send YANG notifications via POST requests. These requests and responses use different content types based on the selected encoding scheme. This document defines support for using CBOR encoding as mentioned in section 1 of [I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15]

CBOR offers an efficient and compact representation of YANG notifications.

Examples of the GET and POST request and reply encoded in CBOR are also provided.

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Terminology

This document uses the following terms defined in Section 2,3 and 4 of [I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15]:

The following term(s) are defined in Subscription to YANG Notifications [RFC8639]:

The following term(s) are defined in Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG in the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) [RFC9254]:

4. CBOR Encoding of the notification(s)

YANG notifications can be encoded in CBOR using Names or SIDs in keys. Notifications encoded using names is similar to JSON encoding as defined in Section 3.4 and 4.3 of [I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15]. Notification encoded using YANG-SIDs replaces the names of the keys of the CBOR encoded message with a 63 bit unsigned integer. In this case, the term 'SID' is defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC9254], and the keys of the encoded data use SID value as mentioned in 4.3.2 of this document.

4.1. Capabilities Request

The publisher sends a request to the receiver to learn its capabilities. In the below example, the “Accept” states that the publisher wants to receive the capabilities response in CBOR but if not supported then in XML or JSON in that order.

GET /some/path/capabilities HTTP/1.1
   Host: example.com
   Accept: application/cbor, application/xml;0.9, application/json;q=0.5

4.2. Capabilities Response

If the receiver is able to reply using “application/cbor” and assuming it is capable of receiving JSON, XML and CBOR encoded messages the response would look like this

4.2.1. CBOR using names as keys

Diagnostic Notation:

   HTTP/1.1 200 OK
   Date: Tue, 4 March 2025 20:33:30 GMT
   Server: example-server
   Cache-Control: no-cache
   Content-Type: application/json
   {
   "receiver-capabilities": {
     "receiver-capability": [
       "urn:ietf:capability:https-notif-receiver:encoding:json",
       "urn:ietf:capability:https-notif-receiver:encoding:xml",
       "urn:ietf:capability:https-notif-receiver:encoding:cbor"
        ]
      }
   }

CBOR Encoding:

A1                                      # map(1)
   75                                   # text(21)
      72656365697665722D6361706162696C6974696573 # "receiver-capabilities"
   A1                                   # map(1)
      73                                # text(19)
         72656365697665722D6361706162696C697479 # "receiver-capability"
      83                                # array(3)
         78 36                          # text(54)
            75726E3A696574663A6361706162696C6974793A68747470732D6E6F7469662D72656365697665723A656E636F64696E673A6A736F6E # "urn:ietf:capability:https-notif-receiver:encoding:json"
         78 35                          # text(53)
            75726E3A696574663A6361706162696C6974793A68747470732D6E6F7469662D72656365697665723A656E636F64696E673A786D6C # "urn:ietf:capability:https-notif-receiver:encoding:xml"
         78 36                          # text(54)
            75726E3A696574663A6361706162696C6974793A68747470732D6E6F7469662D72656365697665723A656E636F64696E673A63626F72 # "urn:ietf:capability:https-notif-receiver:encoding:cbor"

4.3. Relay Notification request

The publisher sends an HTTP POST request to the "relay-notification" resource on the receiver with the "Content-Type" header set to either "application/cbor" in case the receiver is CBOR capable and a body containing the notification encoded in CBOR.

4.3.1. CBOR encoding using names as keys

POST /some/path/relay-notification HTTP/1.1
   Host: example.com
   Content-Type: application/cbor

Diagnostic notation:

   {
     "ietf-https-notif:notification": {
       "eventTime": "2013-12-21T00:01:00Z",
       "example-mod:event" : {
         "event-class" : "fault",
         "reporting-entity" : { "card" : "Ethernet0" },
         "severity" : "major"
       }
     }
   }

Cbor Encoding:

A1                                      # map(1)
   78 1D                                # text(29)
      696574662D68747470732D6E6F7469663A6E6F74696669636174696F6E # "ietf-https-notif:notification"
   A2                                   # map(2)
      69                                # text(9)
         6576656E7454696D65             # "eventTime"
      74                                # text(20)
         323031332D31322D32315430303A30313A30305A # "2013-12-21T00:01:00Z"
      71                                # text(17)
         6578616D706C652D6D6F643A6576656E74 # "example-mod:event"
      A3                                # map(3)
         68                             # text(8)
            7365766572697479            # "severity"
         65                             # text(5)
            6D616A6F72                  # "major"
         6B                             # text(11)
            6576656E742D636C617373      # "event-class"
         65                             # text(5)
            6661756C74                  # "fault"
         70                             # text(16)
            7265706F7274696E672D656E74697479 # "reporting-entity"
         A1                             # map(1)
            64                          # text(4)
               63617264                 # "card"
            69                          # text(9)
               45746865726E657430       # "Ethernet0"

4.3.2. CBOR encoding using SIDs as keys

Diagnostic Notation:

   {
    2600: {
       1: "2013-12-21T00:01:00Z",
       "example-mod:event" : {
         "event-class" : "fault",
         "reporting-entity" : { "card" : "Ethernet0" },
         "severity" : "major"
       }
     }
   }

The above is assuming the YANG module for event notifications has a corresponding .sid file with these entries

"item": [
      {
        "namespace": "module",
        "identifier": "ietf-notification",
        "sid": "2600"
      },
      {
        "namespace": "data",
        "identifier": "/ietf-notification:notification",
        "sid": "2601"
      },
      {
        "namespace": "data",
        "identifier": "/ietf-notification:notification/eventTime",
        "sid": "2602"
      }
    ]

CBOR Encoding:

A1                                      # map(1)
   19 0A28                              # unsigned(2600)
   A2                                   # map(2)
      01                                # unsigned(1)
      74                                # text(20)
         323031332D31322D32315430303A30313A30305A # "2013-12-21T00:01:00Z"
      71                                # text(17)
         6578616D706C652D6D6F643A6576656E74 # "example-mod:event"
      A3                                # map(3)
         68                             # text(8)
            7365766572697479            # "severity"
         65                             # text(5)
            6D616A6F72                  # "major"
         6B                             # text(11)
            6576656E742D636C617373      # "event-class"
         65                             # text(5)
            6661756C74                  # "fault"
         70                             # text(16)
            7265706F7274696E672D656E74697479 # "reporting-entity"
         A1                             # map(1)
            64                          # text(4)
               63617264                 # "card"
            69                          # text(9)
               45746865726E657430       # "Ethernet0"

4.4. Relay Notification Response

The response on success is "204 (No Content)". In case of corrupted or malformed event, the response is an appropriate HTTP error response.

5. Scope of Experimentation

CBOR encoding may be tested against JSON and XML to evaluate requests per second, data transfer rate, and overall network efficiency.

Bandwidth constraints can be applied using traffic control to analyze CBOR encoding efficiency under different network conditions.

6. Security Considerations

Addition of the CBOR encoding introduces no specific security exposures or risks other that the ones mentioned in [RFC9254] and [I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15] (An HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications)

7. IANA Considerations

This document requests the the IANA registry to include an additional entry to the proposed initial assignments in the “Capabilities for HTTPS Notification Receivers” registry within the YANG Notifications registry group(defined in [RFC3553]) as requested in the draft [I-D.ietf-netconf-http-client-server]. The following entry is added :

Record:
   URN:         urn:ietf:params:yang-notif:https-capability:encoding:cbor
   Reference:   RFC XXXX:An HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications
   Description: Identifies support for CBOR-encoded notifications.

8. References

8.1. Normative References

[I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15]
Jethanandani, M. and K. Watsen, "An HTTPS-based Transport for YANG Notifications", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15>.
[I-D.ietf-netconf-http-client-server]
Watsen, K., "YANG Groupings for HTTP Clients and HTTP Servers", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-25, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-25>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8639]
Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications", RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8639>.
[RFC8949]
Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)", STD 94, RFC 8949, DOI 10.17487/RFC8949, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8949>.
[RFC9254]
Veillette, M., Ed., Petrov, I., Ed., Pelov, A., Bormann, C., and M. Richardson, "Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG in the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)", RFC 9254, DOI 10.17487/RFC9254, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9254>.

8.2. Informative References

[RFC3553]
Mealling, M., Masinter, L., Hardie, T., and G. Klyne, "An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters", BCP 73, RFC 3553, DOI 10.17487/RFC3553, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3553>.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowlegde the support of Kent Watsen and Mahesh Jethanandani, the authors of [I-D.draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-15] for their guidance and support provided to draft this document.

Authors' Addresses

Bharadwaja Meherrushi Chittapragada
Siddharth Bhat
Vartika T Rao
Hayyan Arshad
Mohit P. Tahiliani
National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal