From funetnje-owner@nic.funet.fi Thu Apr 20 16:49:09 1995 Received: by nic.funet.fi id <9947-2>; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 16:39:03 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: funetnje@nic.funet.fi Subject: Test to mailing-list Message-Id: <95Apr20.163903+0300_eet_dst.9947-2+221@nic.funet.fi> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 16:39:01 +0300 test From funetnje-owner@nic.funet.fi Fri Apr 21 17:02:00 1995 Received: by nic.funet.fi id <9484-2>; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 17:01:54 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: funetnje@nic.funet.fi Subject: New version of FUNETNJE... Message-Id: <95Apr21.170154+0300_eet_dst.9484-2+276@nic.funet.fi> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 17:01:53 +0300 Well, lately there have been several per day. Now I am inclined to classify this as a pretty good one :) I have found several lesser, and larger problems over the last few days. As of now I am running it in a debugger with a thing called "debugging malloc" (edit the Makefile, if you don't have it -- propably you don't have it, it is ZMailer's libmalloc..) So far so good, now it should run over the weekend unattended (as if I stay away from the office...) /Matti Aarnio From funetnje-owner@nic.funet.fi Sat Jun 10 07:18:13 1995 Received: by nic.funet.fi id <90200-4>; Sat, 10 Jun 1995 07:17:48 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: funetnje@nic.funet.fi Subject: New FUNETNJE version available Message-Id: <95Jun10.071748+0300_eet_dst.90200-4+9@nic.funet.fi> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 1995 07:17:47 +0300 Hello, I have now created a new source-dump of FUNETNJE into FUNET file archive at directory URL: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/networking/bitnet/ The dump is there with names: funetnje-2.999.tar.gz funetnje-950610.tar.gz Because the documentation is not fully completed, and potential problems do exist, I don't yet call it 3.0 .. (That problem appears on interaction with JNET, which does not like our active opened connection, and reports bad BCB sequence number.. Manager of FIPORT said that JNET quality has dropped lately, so it may be a problem in there as well. It does NOT occur on link to FINHUTC - real IBM, nor to other FUNETNJE.. ) I have successfully stress-tested the NJE-transport in between two FUNETNJEs, one on DEC 3000/900 AXP with OSF/1 (sort of UNIX), other on a 486/33 with Linux-1.2.9. They have now sent tens of files to each other both directions simultaneously, and done so without a glitch (at the start of the link there were some 70-80 files on both machines waiting to be sent to NOBODY@other_end. Before last night's marathon session such workload was enough to cause communication error(s) to appear.) Production transmissions over the FINFILES-FIPORT link to the main network have always been successfull, but likely much less stressfull :-) /Matti Aarnio