[ NOTE: This message may be a duplicate for some people.  Chip ]

From P.L.Mason@bath.ac.uk Fri Jun 30 07:11 MDT 1995
From: P.L.Mason@bath.ac.uk
>Received: from ns-1.csn.net (root@ns-1.csn.net [199.117.27.21]) by uucp-1.csn.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id DAA29196 for <tesla@grendel.objinc.com>; Fri, 30 Jun 1995 03:44:14 -0600
To: P.L.Mason@bath.ac.uk, dewzenol@inlink.com, robert.michaels@online.sme.org,
        vannoje@okra.millsaps.edu, tesla@grendel.objinc.com
Subject: Re: Interference
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 95 10:43:26 BST


> As I have mentioned, following these guidelines will cure most of
> your problems. Any remaining interference is a result of the
> inductive field surrounding the coil, this inductive interference
> is very limited in range.
> 
> Richard Quick
> 

Well, it seems that I have not implemented any of the above points which you 
mentioned, so I shall have plenty of work to do. Thanks for the advice.

(maybe I'll wait until I build a bigger one)

Phil Mason


